Current:Home > FinanceThis Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early -AssetLink
This Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early
View
Date:2025-04-23 06:01:55
Don't claim Social Security early for the wrong reasons
Many Americans fear for the future of Social Security, and this could be leading them to make some bad choices.
In fact, one recent study showed 44% of people think Social Security is going to run out of money before their retirement. This is one reason more than four in 10 people indicate they plan to claim Social Security between the ages of 62 and 65. By contrast, just 10% plan to wait until 70.
While it may seem smart to collect benefits ASAP in such a scenario, this is actually the worst possible reason to claim Social Security early. Here's why.
Making decisions related to Social Security because of a fear you won't get any benefits at all is a short-sighted choice that could cost you thousands of dollars. There are a few reasons for that.
Despite popular belief, Social Security is not in danger of running out of money. It has a steady revenue stream that comes from current workers' payroll taxes. This is not going to stop happening unless everyone in the U.S. stops working or unless the funding mechanism is changed -- which is extremely unlikely to occur.
It is true, however, that Social Security's trust fund is in danger of depletion by 2033. But if that happens, there would still be enough money coming from tax revenue to pay about 77% of the benefits promised. That's a hit, but it doesn't mean you won't get any of your retirement funds
Can I collect Social Security yet?It depends on when you were born.
Claiming Social Security early guarantees a smaller monthly check
The reality is, an early Social Security claim is going to mean you definitely get a smaller monthly benefit.
That's because you will get hit with early filing penalties if you claim before FRA. These could shrink your monthly checks by as much as 30% depending on how far ahead of schedule you start payments. And if you wait until FRA but not until age 70, you'll pass up delayed retirement credits that increase your monthly benefit up to 8% for each full year that you delay payments.
You do give up income by waiting to get benefits, but the majority of retirees are better off waiting until 70 because the larger monthly checks from claiming at that age add up to higher lifetime income from Social Security.
So, unless there are clear reasons why you want your benefits early -- such as concerns about your health or a desire to retire early that hinges on Social Security -- you should think very carefully before you make that choice. And definitely don't claim benefits prematurely out of fear of a future without them as that's unlikely to happen.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (3)
Related
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Beyoncé Handles Minor Wardrobe Malfunction With Ease During Renaissance Show
- New York Assembly Approves Climate Bill That Would Cut Emissions to Zero
- How did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- How did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown
- Elon Musk issues temporary limit on number of Twitter posts users can view
- 9 shot, 2 suffer traumatic injuries at Wichita nightclub
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Brooklyn Startup Tackles Global Health with a Cleaner Stove
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- The Biggest Threat to Growing Marijuana in California Used to Be the Law. Now, it’s Climate Change
- Droughts That Start Over the Ocean? They’re Often Worse Than Those That Form Over Land
- Lala Kent Reacts to Raquel Leviss' Tearful Confession on Vanderpump Rules Reunion
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- Minorities Targeted with Misinformation on Obama’s Clean Power Plan, Groups Say
- Coach Outlet Has Gorgeous Summer Handbags & Accessories on Sale for as Low as $19
- Ashley Tisdale Enters Her French Girl Era With New Curtain Bangs
Recommendation
2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
Migrant workers said to be leaving Florida over new immigration law
Transcript: Former Attorney General Eric Holder on Face the Nation, July 2, 2023
6 Years After Exxon’s Oil Pipeline Burst in an Arkansas Town, a Final Accounting
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Nine Ways Biden’s $2 Trillion Plan Will Tackle Climate Change
At Flint Debate, Clinton and Sanders Avoid Talk of Environmental Racism
After Katrina, New Orleans’ Climate Conundrum: Fight or Flight?